Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38933188›Full record

ArticleFundamental research2024

Development of the second version of Global Prediction System for Epidemiological Pandemic.

Jianping Huang, Li Zhang, Bin Chen, Xiaoyue Liu, Wei Yan, Yingjie Zhao, Siyu Chen, Xinbo Lian, Chuwei Liu, Rui Wang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fundamental research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jianping HuangCollaborative Innovation Center for Western Ecological Safety, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Li ZhangCollege of Atmospheric Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Bin ChenCollaborative Innovation Center for Western Ecological Safety, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Xiaoyue LiuCollege of Atmospheric Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Wei YanCollege of Atmospheric Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Yingjie ZhaoCollege of Atmospheric Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Siyu ChenCollaborative Innovation Center for Western Ecological Safety, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Xinbo LianCollege of Atmospheric Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Chuwei LiuCollege of Atmospheric Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Rui WangCollege of Atmospheric Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Shuoyuan GaoCollege of Atmospheric Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Danfeng WangCollaborative Innovation Center for Western Ecological Safety, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a severe global public health emergency that has caused a major crisis in the safety of human life, health, global economy, and social order. Moreover, COVID-19 poses significant challenges to healthcare systems worldwide. The prediction and early warning of infectious diseases on a global scale are the premise and basis for countries to jointly fight epidemics. However, because of the complexity of epidemics, predicting infectious diseases on a global scale faces significant challenges. In this study, we developed the second version of Global Prediction System for Epidemiological Pandemic (GPEP-2), which combines statistical methods with a modified epidemiological model. The GPEP-2 introduces various parameterization schemes for both impacts of natural factors (seasonal variations in weather and environmental impacts) and human social behaviors (government control and isolation, personnel gathered, indoor propagation, virus mutation, and vaccination). The GPEP-2 successfully predicted the COVID-19 pandemic in over 180 countries with an average accuracy rate of 82.7%. It also provided prediction and decision-making bases for several regional-scale COVID-19 pandemic outbreaks in China, with an average accuracy rate of 89.3%. Results showed that both anthropogenic and natural factors can affect virus spread and control measures in the early stages of an epidemic can effectively control the spread. The predicted results could serve as a reference for public health planning and policymaking.

Indexed as

COVID-19Epidemiological modelGPEPPredictionSEIRStatistical-dynamic

Identifiers

PMID38933188
PMCPMC11197730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.