ReviewPulmonary circulation2024
Pulmonary vascular disease, environmental pollution, and climate change.
Review in Pulmonary circulation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association between hydrocarbon exposure and risk of stroke: a systematic literature review.BMC neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Pathogenesis and Phenotypes of Pulmonary Vascular Disease in COPD: A Consensus Statement From the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute's Innovative Drug Development Initiative - PH Group 3 Workstream.Pulmonary circulation · 2026Article
- One Health Insights into Pulmonary Hypertension: Bridging Human and Canine Medicine.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- Public health consequences of global climate change. A narrative review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Observational
- Assessing the causality between pulmonary arterial hypertension and cancer: insights from Mendelian randomization.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- Management of pulmonary hypertension in special conditions.The European respiratory journal · 2024Review
- Infection and pulmonary vascular diseases consortium: United against a global health challenge.Pulmonary circulation · 2024Article
- Pulmonary vascular disease, environmental pollution, and climate change.Pulmonary circulation · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pollution and climate change constitute a combined, grave and pervasive threat to humans and to the life-support systems on which they depend. Evidence shows a strong association between pollution and climate change on cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, and pulmonary vascular disease (PVD) is no exception. An increasing number of studies has documented the impact of environmental pollution and extreme temperatures on pulmonary circulation and the right heart, on the severity and outcomes of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (PH), on the incidence of pulmonary embolism, and the prevalence and severity of diseases associated with PH. Furthermore, the downstream consequences of climate change impair health care systems' accessibility, which could pose unique obstacles in the case of PVD patients, who require a complex and sophisticated network of health interventions. Patients, caretakers and health care professionals should thus be included in the design of policies aimed at adaptation to and mitigation of current challenges, and prevention of further climate change. The purpose of this review is to summarize the available evidence concerning the impact of environmental pollution and climate change on the pulmonary circulation, and to propose measures at the individual, healthcare and community levels directed at protecting patients with PVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.