Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38933144›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2024

Finding the limits of deep learning clinical sensitivity with fractional anisotropy (FA) microstructure maps.

Marta Gaviraghi, Antonio Ricciardi, Fulvia Palesi, Wallace Brownlee, Paolo Vitali, Ferran Prados, Baris Kanber, Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marta GaviraghiDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Antonio RicciardiNMR Research Unit, Department of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Fulvia PalesiDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Wallace BrownleeNMR Research Unit, Department of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Paolo VitaliDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Ferran PradosNMR Research Unit, Department of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Baris KanberNMR Research Unit, Department of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-KingshottDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S026088/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Quantitative maps obtained with diffusion weighted (DW) imaging, such as fractional anisotropy (FA) -calculated by fitting the diffusion tensor (DT) model to the data,-are very useful to study neurological diseases. To fit this map accurately, acquisition times of the order of several minutes are needed because many noncollinear DW volumes must be acquired to reduce directional biases. Deep learning (DL) can be used to reduce acquisition times by reducing the number of DW volumes. We already developed a DL network named "one-minute FA," which uses 10 DW volumes to obtain FA maps, maintaining the same characteristics and clinical sensitivity of the FA maps calculated with the standard method using more volumes. Recent publications have indicated that it is possible to train DL networks and obtain FA maps even with 4 DW input volumes, far less than the minimum number of directions for the mathematical estimation of the DT. Methods: Here we investigated the impact of reducing the number of DW input volumes to 4 or 7, and evaluated the performance and clinical sensitivity of the corresponding DL networks trained to calculate FA, while comparing results also with those using our one-minute FA. Each network training was performed on the human connectome project open-access dataset that has a high resolution and many DW volumes, used to fit a ground truth FA. To evaluate the generalizability of each network, they were tested on two external clinical datasets, not seen during training, and acquired on different scanners with different protocols, as previously done. Results: Using 4 or 7 DW volumes, it was possible to train DL networks to obtain FA maps with the same range of values as ground truth - map, only when using HCP test data; pathological sensitivity was lost when tested using the external clinical datasets: indeed in both cases, no consistent differences were found between patient groups. On the contrary, our "one-minute FA" did not suffer from the same problem. Conclusion: When developing DL networks for reduced acquisition times, the ability to generalize and to generate quantitative biomarkers that provide clinical sensitivity must be addressed.

Indexed as

clinical sensitivitydeep learningdiffusion MRIfast sequencefractional anisotropymultiple sclerosistemporal lobe epilepsy

Identifiers

PMID38933144
PMCPMC11199892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.