ArticleJournal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus2024
Evaluation of novel open-source software for cardiac optical mapping.
Article in Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
KairoSight-3.0 is a recently released Python-based, open-source software for cardiac optical mapping analysis. Addressing challenges in high-resolution electrophysiological data analysis, KairoSight-3.0 facilitates comprehensive studies of cardiac conduction and excitation-contraction coupling. We compared its performance with ElectroMap, focusing on action potential duration and conduction velocity measurements in mouse heart models subjected to ischaemia and flecainide treatment. Our findings reveal that while both software are effective, inherent methodological differences impact measurement outcomes. KairoSight-3.0's robust analysis capabilities make it a valuable tool in cardiac research. Additionally, future directions for KairoSight-3.0 and other mapping analysis tools are explored. Statement of importance: Open-source methods for analysis of cardiac optical mapping are vital tools in electrophysiological research. Our work directly evaluates the latest version of KarioSight, recently published in JMCC plus, with ElectroMap, an established and widely used tool. Our results show both software are effective in analysis of changes in both conduction and repolarisation. Considering the new features of KairoSight-3.0 and python implementation, our study importantly demonstrates the effectiveness of the software, highlights potential discrepancies between it and ElectroMap, and provides a perspective on future directions for KairoSight-3.0 and other software.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.