ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2024
Comparative time-dependent proteomics reveal the tolerance of cancer cells to magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles.
Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Omics-Based Functional Fingerprinting of Nanoparticles in Cancer: Toward Predictive Nanomedicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Nanomaterials for Photodynamic Therapy in Cancer: Classifications, Recent Advances, and Combination Applications.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Advanced bone-targeted nanomaterials for the systemic treatment of osteoporosis.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Nanomaterials based on hollow gold nanospheres for cancer therapy.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer is one of the most challenging diseases in the world. Recently, iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) are emerging materials with rapid development and high application value, and have shown great potential on tumor therapy due to their unique magnetic and biocompatible properties. However, some data hint us that IONPs were toxic to normal cells and vital organs. Thus, more data on biosafety evaluation is urgently needed. In this study, we compared the effects of silicon-coated IONPs (Si-IONPs) on two cell types: the tumor cells (Hela) and the normal cells (HEK293T, as 293 T for short), compared differences of protein composition, allocation and physical characteristics between these two cells. The major findings of our study pointed out that 293 T cells death occurred more significant than that of Hela cells after Si-IONPs treatment, and the rate and content of endocytosis of Si-IONPs in 293 T cells was more prominent than in Hela cells. Our results also showed Si-IONPs significant promoted the production of reactive oxygen species and disturbed pathways related to oxidative stress, iron homeostasis, apoptosis and ferroptosis in both two types of cells, however, Hela cells recovered from these disturbances more easily than 293 T. In conclusion, compared with Hela cells, IONPs are more likely to induce 293 T cells death and Hela cells have their own unique mechanisms to defense invaders, reminding scientists that future in vivo and in vitro studies of nanoparticles need to be cautious, and more safety data are needed for further clinical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.