Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38933041›Full record

ArticleChina CDC weekly2024

Prevalence of Cannabis Use around the World: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2000-2024.

Qianning Wang, Zhen Qin, Xing Xing, He Zhu, Zhongwei Jia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in China CDC weekly, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A 2025 Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey on Public Attitudes Toward the Legalization and Depenalization of Recreational Cannabis in Poland.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Video gaming and cannabis use: A scoping review.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qianning WangNational Institute of Health Data Science, Center for Drug Abuse Prevention and Control, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Zhen QinSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Xing XingSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
He ZhuSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Zhongwei JiaNational Institute of Health Data Science, Center for Drug Abuse Prevention and Control, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the global prevalence of cannabis use to inform drug prevention strategies, policy-making, and resource allocation. This study initially screened 177,843 studies published between January 1, 2000, and January 15, 2024, using peer-reviewed databases including Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Ultimately, 595 studies were identified for data extraction, and 39 of these were selected as country-representative studies. Heterogeneity among the selected studies was assessed using the chi-squared test and I

Indexed as

cannabis legalizationcannabis usemeta-analysisprevalencesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38933041
PMCPMC11196877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.