ArticleEcology and evolution2024
Designing eco-evolutionary experiments for restoration projects: Opportunities and constraints revealed during stickleback introductions.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eco-Evolutionary Dynamics of Infection and Immunity in Experimentally Founded Lake Populations of Threespine Stickleback.The American naturalist · 2026Article
- Genetic Implications of Plant Sourcing Strategies for Salt Marsh Restoration.Evolutionary applications · 2026Article
- Trait-based approaches to restoration ecology: Synthesizing insights from diverse systems.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026Review
- Predator Communities With Invasive Pike Are Associated With Changes in Parental Care and Brain Gene Expression in Wild Alaskan Stickleback.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026Article
- Heritable differences in metabolic stability underpin thermal tolerance of threespine stickleback (bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Genome sequence of a marine threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) from Rabbit Slough in the Cook Inlet.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Non-Random Mortality in an Experimental Oyster Restoration.Evolutionary applications · 2025Article
- Collective behavior diverges independently of the benthic-limnetic axis in stickleback.Behavioral ecology and sociobiology · 2025Article
- Does Motility-Restricting Fibrosis Influence Dispersal? An Experiment in Nature With Threespine Stickleback.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Destabilized host-parasite dynamics in newly founded populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Designing eco-evolutionary experiments for restoration projects: Opportunities and constraints revealed during stickleback introductions.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eco-evolutionary experiments are typically conducted in semi-unnatural controlled settings, such as mesocosms; yet inferences about how evolution and ecology interact in the real world would surely benefit from experiments in natural uncontrolled settings. Opportunities for such experiments are rare but do arise in the context of restoration ecology-where different "types" of a given species can be introduced into different "replicate" locations. Designing such experiments requires wrestling with consequential questions. (Q1) Which specific "types" of a focal species should be introduced to the restoration location? (Q2) How many sources of each type should be used-and should they be mixed together? (Q3) Which
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.