ArticleJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders2024
Comparison of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio, and C-reactive protein in predicting osteomyelitis in patients with diabetic foot ulcer.
Article in Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Inflammation, diabetic foot and related treatments.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Identification of Risk Factors for Poor Prognosis and Analysis of Their Correlation with Ulcer Severity in Diabetic Foot Patients Undergoing Digital Subtraction Angiography-Guided Intervention.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet/ lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are readily available and inexpensive biomarkers that have received great attention for diagnosing type 2 diabetes(T2DM) complications. The objective of the present cross-sectional study was to compare diagnostic values of these biomarkers with C-reactive protein(CRP) in detecting diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) and osteomyelitis (OS) and discriminating between the degree of DFU according to Wagner's classification. Methods: A total of 217 individuals (42 healthy controls, 40 T2DM patients without DFU, and 135 patients with DFU) were enrolled. The DFU patients were classified according to Wagner's classification into grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3. Blood samples were obtained and various biochemical and hematological parameters including creatine, CRP, HbA1c, NLR, and PLR were measured. Results: The levels of CRP, PLR, and NLR were significantly higher in the patients with DFU and OS compared to healthy controls and T2DM patients without DFU. The median values of CRP were correlated with the severity of DFU and increased with DFU grades. The highest values of CRP, NLR, and PLR were observed in the DFU patients with OS which were significantly higher than those of DFU patients with grades 1 and 2 as well as T2DM patients without DFU. The PLR and NLR had no significant performance in diagnosing DFU patients with grades 1 and 2 from the patients without DFU. Conclusion: Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-023-01327-w.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.