ArticleJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders2024
The association of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease risk score based on the Framingham and ACC/AHA risk prediction models: a cross-sectional analysis of Bushehr Elderly Health Program.
Article in Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Relationship between cardiovascular health and osteoarthritis in middle-aged and elderly U.S. population: a cross-sectional NHANES study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The association between osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease, two major health problems, has been reported in some studies. In this study was aimed to investigate the relationship between osteoporosis and the CVD risk score based on Framingham and American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) prediction models in the population over 60 years old. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on data from 2389 men and women participating in the Bushehr Elderly Health (BEH) program. Osteoporosis was defended as T-score ≤ - 2.5 at any site (total hip, femoral neck and lumbar spine (L1-L4). Based on Framingham and ACC/AHA risk scores, participants were categorized as non-high risk (< 20%) or high-risk (≥ 20%). Logistic regression model, was applied to investigate the relationship between osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease risk scores. All comparisons were stratified by sex. Results: Considering the cut point of ≥ 20% for CVD risk, 36.7% of women and 66.2% of men were categorized as having high risk of CVD in ACC/AHA model. These values in women and men based on the Framingham model were 30% and 35.7%, respectively. In general, there was a negative significant correlation between BMD in the femoral neck, total hip and TBS except for the spine with the CVD risk score in both models. After adjusting for confounding variables, a significant positive association was observed between osteoporosis only at femoral neck with CVD risk score ≥ 20% based on ACC/AHA in both genders. Conclusion: The ACC/AHA model is effective in identifying the CVD risk difference between individuals with and without osteoporosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.