Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38932756›Full record

ArticleNuclear medicine and molecular imaging2024

Clinical Performance Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Amyloid Brain PET Quantification Method.

Seung Kwan Kang, Mina Heo, Ji Yeon Chung, Daewoon Kim, Seong A Shin, Hongyoon Choi, Ari Chung, Jung-Min Ha, Hoowon Kim, Jae Sung Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Neuroimaging.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  13. Are the Nuclear Neuro-Imaging Biomarkers Reliable?Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Seung Kwan KangBrightonix Imaging Inc., Seoul, Korea.
Mina HeoDepartment of Neurology, College of Medicine, Chosun University and Chosun University Hospital, 365 Pilmun-Daero, Dong-Gu, Gwangju, South Korea.
Ji Yeon ChungDepartment of Neurology, College of Medicine, Chosun University and Chosun University Hospital, 365 Pilmun-Daero, Dong-Gu, Gwangju, South Korea.
Daewoon KimInterdisciplinary Program of Bioengineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Seong A ShinBrightonix Imaging Inc., Seoul, Korea.
Hongyoon ChoiInstitute of Radiation Medicine, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ari ChungDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, College of Medicine, Chosun University and Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.
Jung-Min HaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, College of Medicine, Chosun University and Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.
Hoowon KimDepartment of Neurology, College of Medicine, Chosun University and Chosun University Hospital, 365 Pilmun-Daero, Dong-Gu, Gwangju, South Korea.
Jae Sung LeeBrightonix Imaging Inc., Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7623-053X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study assesses the clinical performance of BTXBrain-Amyloid, an artificial intelligence-powered software for quantifying amyloid uptake in brain PET images. Methods: 150 amyloid brain PET images were visually assessed by experts and categorized as negative and positive. Standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) was calculated with cerebellum grey matter as the reference region, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and precision-recall (PR) analysis for BTXBrain-Amyloid were conducted. For comparison, same image processing and analysis was performed using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) program. In addition, to evaluate the spatial normalization (SN) performance, mutual information (MI) between MRI template and spatially normalized PET images was calculated and SPM group analysis was conducted. Results: Both BTXBrain and SPM methods discriminated between negative and positive groups. However, BTXBrain exhibited lower SUVR standard deviation (0.06 and 0.21 for negative and positive, respectively) than SPM method (0.11 and 0.25). In ROC analysis, BTXBrain had an AUC of 0.979, compared to 0.959 for SPM, while PR curves showed an AUC of 0.983 for BTXBrain and 0.949 for SPM. At the optimal cut-off, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.983 and 0.921 for BTXBrain and 0.917 and 0.921 for SPM12, respectively. MI evaluation also favored BTXBrain (0.848 vs. 0.823), indicating improved SN. In SPM group analysis, BTXBrain exhibited higher sensitivity in detecting basal ganglia differences between negative and positive groups. Conclusion: BTXBrain-Amyloid outperformed SPM in clinical performance evaluation, also demonstrating superior SN and improved detection of deep brain differences. These results suggest the potential of BTXBrain-Amyloid as a valuable tool for clinical amyloid PET image evaluation.

Indexed as

Alzheimer dementiaAmyloidDeep learningQuantificationSpatial normalization

Identifiers

PMID38932756
PMCPMC11196433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.