ArticleNuclear medicine and molecular imaging2024
Clinical Performance Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Amyloid Brain PET Quantification Method.
Article in Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- From Single-Modal to Multi-Modal Artificial Intelligence in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review of Databases, Modalities, Diagnostic Performance, and Clinical Translation Challenges.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Brain Serotonin Transporter Is Elevated in Obesity: Bayesian and Frequentist Meta-Analyses.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Pooled it
- Stage-stratified benefits of AI-radiomics PET in early Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Impact of adjunctive quantitative analysis on visual interpretation of amyloid PET: a multiple tracer, multicentre study.European radiology · 2026Article
- Brain Amyloid Deposition Is Negatively Associated with Cardiac Amyloid Retention in Apo E4 Carriers: A Pilot Study.Molecular imaging and biology · 2026Article
- Development of AI-based dopamine transporter (DAT) image generation technique using early phase [18F]-FP-CIT PET imaging.PloS one · 2026Article
- The Change of Dopamine Transporter After Glucose Loading Is Associated With an Individual's Attitude Toward Sweet Foods in Healthy Young Males.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Does Q.Clear Processing Change PET Ratios? Quantitative Evidence Using BTXBrain-DAT.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Reliability of Automated Amyloid PET Quantification: Real-World Validation of Commercial Tools Against Centiloid Project Method.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
- Automated quantification of brain PET in PET/CT using deep learning-based CT-to-MR translation: a feasibility study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Longitudinal Analysis of Amyloid PET and Brain MRI for Predicting Conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Disease: Findings from the ADNI Cohort.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Neuroimaging.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Are the Nuclear Neuro-Imaging Biomarkers Reliable?Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Association of plasma irisin levels with amyloid burden in the Alzheimer's disease spectrum.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study assesses the clinical performance of BTXBrain-Amyloid, an artificial intelligence-powered software for quantifying amyloid uptake in brain PET images. Methods: 150 amyloid brain PET images were visually assessed by experts and categorized as negative and positive. Standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) was calculated with cerebellum grey matter as the reference region, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and precision-recall (PR) analysis for BTXBrain-Amyloid were conducted. For comparison, same image processing and analysis was performed using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) program. In addition, to evaluate the spatial normalization (SN) performance, mutual information (MI) between MRI template and spatially normalized PET images was calculated and SPM group analysis was conducted. Results: Both BTXBrain and SPM methods discriminated between negative and positive groups. However, BTXBrain exhibited lower SUVR standard deviation (0.06 and 0.21 for negative and positive, respectively) than SPM method (0.11 and 0.25). In ROC analysis, BTXBrain had an AUC of 0.979, compared to 0.959 for SPM, while PR curves showed an AUC of 0.983 for BTXBrain and 0.949 for SPM. At the optimal cut-off, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.983 and 0.921 for BTXBrain and 0.917 and 0.921 for SPM12, respectively. MI evaluation also favored BTXBrain (0.848 vs. 0.823), indicating improved SN. In SPM group analysis, BTXBrain exhibited higher sensitivity in detecting basal ganglia differences between negative and positive groups. Conclusion: BTXBrain-Amyloid outperformed SPM in clinical performance evaluation, also demonstrating superior SN and improved detection of deep brain differences. These results suggest the potential of BTXBrain-Amyloid as a valuable tool for clinical amyloid PET image evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.