Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38932578›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2025

Invited commentary: motivating better methods-and better data collection-for measuring the prevalence of drug misuse.

Mathew V Kiang, Monica J Alexander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mathew V KiangDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9198-150X
Monica J AlexanderDepartment of Sociology, Faculty of Arts and Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1Z5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8135-3435

Funding

Reducing racial disparities in the treatment of opioid use disorder using machine learning-based causal analysisR00DA051534 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KIANG, MATHEW VINHHOA · 2022 to 2024
$747k
NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA051534NIDA NIH HHS R00DA051534NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The United States continues to suffer a drug overdose crisis that has resulted in over 100 000 deaths annually since 2021. Despite decades of attention, estimates of the prevalence of drug use at the spatiotemporal resolutions necessary for resource allocation and intervention evaluation are lacking. Current approaches for measuring the prevalence of drug use, such as population surveys, capture-recapture, and multiplier methods, have significant limitations. In a recent article, Santaella-Tenorio et al (Am J Epidemiol. 2024;193(7):959-967) used a novel joint bayesian spatiotemporal modeling approach to estimate the county-level prevalence of opioid misuse in New York State from 2007 to 2018 and identify significant intrastate variation. By leveraging 5 data sources and simultaneously modeling different opioid-related outcomes-such as numbers of deaths, emergency department visits, and treatment visits-they obtained policy-relevant insights into the prevalence of opioid misuse and opioid-related outcomes at high spatiotemporal resolutions. The study provides future researchers with a sophisticated modeling approach that will allow them to incorporate multiple data sources in a rigorous statistical framework. The limitations of the study reflect the constraints of the broader field and underscore the importance of enhancing current surveillance with better, newer, and more timely data that are both standardized and easily accessible to inform public health policies and interventions. This article is part of a Special Collection on Mental Health.

Indexed as

Data CollectionOpioid-Related DisordersSubstance-Related DisordersBayes TheoremHumansNew YorkPrevalencebayesian modelingdrug misuseopioidsprevalence

Identifiers

PMID38932578
PMCPMC11735954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.