Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38932536›Full record

ArticleSheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi2024

[A design of interactive review for computer aided diagnosis of pulmonary nodules based on active learning].

Shuangping Tan, Jun Li, Xiaojuan Zhang, Xinyue Yan, Tong Zhang, Xiali Wu, Ziqiang Liu, Lili Li, Juan Feng, Haibin Han and 3 more

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shuangping TanWuhan Puai Hospital (Wuhan Fourth Hospital), Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430033, P. R. China.
Jun LiWuhan Puai Hospital (Wuhan Fourth Hospital), Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430033, P. R. China.
Xiaojuan ZhangWuhan University, Wuhan 430079, P. R. China.
Xinyue YanWuhan University, Wuhan 430079, P. R. China.
Tong ZhangWuhan University, Wuhan 430079, P. R. China.
Xiali WuThe First People's Hospital of Jiangxia District Wuhan, Wuhan 430200, P. R. China.
Ziqiang LiuThe First People's Hospital of Jiangxia District Wuhan, Wuhan 430200, P. R. China.
Lili LiThe First People's Hospital of Jiangxia District Wuhan, Wuhan 430200, P. R. China.
Juan FengThe First People's Hospital of Jiangxia District Wuhan, Wuhan 430200, P. R. China.
Haibin HanThe First People's Hospital of Jiangxia District Wuhan, Wuhan 430200, P. R. China.
Guoying TangThe First People's Hospital of Jiangxia District Wuhan, Wuhan 430200, P. R. China.
Junzhou HanThe First People's Hospital of Jiangxia District Wuhan, Wuhan 430200, P. R. China.
Youfeng DengThe First People's Hospital of Jiangxia District Wuhan, Wuhan 430200, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automatic detection of pulmonary nodule based on computer tomography (CT) images can significantly improve the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. However, there is a lack of effective interactive tools to record the marked results of radiologists in real time and feed them back to the algorithm model for iterative optimization. This paper designed and developed an online interactive review system supporting the assisted diagnosis of lung nodules in CT images. Lung nodules were detected by the preset model and presented to doctors, who marked or corrected the lung nodules detected by the system with their professional knowledge, and then iteratively optimized the AI model with active learning strategy according to the marked results of radiologists to continuously improve the accuracy of the model. The subset 5-9 dataset of the lung nodule analysis 2016(LUNA16) was used for iteration experiments. The precision, F1-score and MioU indexes were steadily improved with the increase of the number of iterations, and the precision increased from 0.213 9 to 0.565 6. The results in this paper show that the system not only uses deep segmentation model to assist radiologists, but also optimizes the model by using radiologists' feedback information to the maximum extent, iteratively improving the accuracy of the model and better assisting radiologists.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedLung NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansMachine LearningMultiple Pulmonary NodulesRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSolitary Pulmonary NoduleActive learningInteractive reviewPulmonary nodule detection

Identifiers

PMID38932536
PMCPMC11208657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.