Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38932486›Full record

SynthesisNeuropsychopharmacology reports2024

Neurophysiological profiles of patients with bipolar disorders as probed with transcranial magnetic stimulation: A systematic review.

Keita Taniguchi, Naotsugu Kaneko, Masataka Wada, Sotaro Moriyama, Shinichiro Nakajima, Masaru Mimura, Yoshihiro Noda

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuropsychopharmacology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Keita TaniguchiDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0009-0002-0643-8452
Naotsugu KanekoDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masataka WadaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Sotaro MoriyamaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinichiro NakajimaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4229-1910
Masaru MimuraDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshihiro NodaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2155-0357

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimBipolar disorder (BD) has a significant impact on global health, yet its neurophysiological basis remains poorly understood. Conventional treatments have limitations, highlighting the need for a better understanding of the neurophysiology of BD for early diagnosis and novel therapeutic strategies.

designEmploying a systematic review approach of the PRISMA guidelines, this study assessed the usefulness and validity of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) neurophysiology in patients with BD.

methodsDatabases searched included PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO, covering studies from January 1985 to January 2024.

resultsOut of 6597 articles screened, nine studies met the inclusion criteria, providing neurophysiological insights into the pathophysiological basis of BD using TMS-electromyography and TMS-electroencephalography methods. Findings revealed significant neurophysiological impairments in patients with BD compared to healthy controls, specifically in cortical inhibition and excitability. In particular, short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI) was consistently diminished in BD across the studies, which suggests a fundamental impairment of cortical inhibitory function in BD. This systematic review corroborates the potential utility of TMS neurophysiology in elucidating the pathophysiological basis of BD. Specifically, the reduced cortical inhibition in the SICI paradigm observed in patients with BD suggests gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-A receptor-mediated dysfunction, but results from other TMS paradigms have been inconsistent. Thus, complex neurophysiological processes may be involved in the pathological basis underlying BD. This study demonstrated that BD has a neural basis involving impaired GABAergic function, and it is highly expected that further research on TMS neurophysiology will further elucidate the pathophysiological basis of BD.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderTranscranial Magnetic StimulationElectroencephalographyElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorHumansNeural Inhibitionbipolar disordersdepressionelectroencephalographyneurophysiologystimulation methodstranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38932486
PMCPMC11544454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.