Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38932090›Full record

ReviewPolymers2024

Substrate Neutrality for Obtaining Block Copolymer Vertical Orientation.

Kaitlyn Hillery, Nayanathara Hendeniya, Shaghayegh Abtahi, Caden Chittick, Boyce Chang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kaitlyn HilleryDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Nayanathara HendeniyaDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Shaghayegh AbtahiDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-8652-675X
Caden ChittickDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-8355-1066
Boyce ChangDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.

Funding

Iowa State University Start-up funds
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanopatterning methods utilizing block copolymer (BCP) self-assembly are attractive for semiconductor fabrication due to their molecular precision and high resolution. Grafted polymer brushes play a crucial role in providing a neutral surface conducive for the orientational control of BCPs. These brushes create a non-preferential substrate, allowing wetting of the distinct chemistries from each block of the BCP. This vertically aligns the BCP self-assembled lattice to create patterns that are useful for semiconductor nanofabrication. In this review, we aim to explore various methods used to tune the substrate and BCP interface toward a neutral template. This review takes a historical perspective on the polymer brush methods developed to achieve substrate neutrality. We divide the approaches into copolymer and blended homopolymer methods. Early attempts to obtain neutral substrates utilized end-grafted random copolymers that consisted of monomers from each block. This evolved into side-group-grafted chains, cross-linked mats, and block cooligomer brushes. Amidst the augmentation of the chain architecture, homopolymer blends were developed as a facile method where polymer chains with each chemistry were mixed and grafted onto the substrate. This was largely believed to be challenging due to the macrophase separation of the chemically incompatible chains. However, innovative methods such as sequential grafting and BCP compatibilizers were utilized to circumvent this problem. The advantages and challenges of each method are discussed in the context of neutrality and feasibility.

Indexed as

block copolymerdirected self-assemblylithographyself-assembly

Identifiers

PMID38932090
PMCPMC11207976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.