Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38932021›Full record

ReviewPolymers2024

Nature's Plastic Predators: A Comprehensive and Bibliometric Review of Plastivore Insects.

Joseph Boctor, Gunjan Pandey, Wei Xu, Daniel V Murphy, Frances C Hoyle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joseph BoctorBioplastics Innovation Hub, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.
Gunjan PandeyCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Environment, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3514-4624
Wei XuBioplastics Innovation Hub, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4019-5140
Daniel V MurphyBioplastics Innovation Hub, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4686-9276
Frances C HoyleBioplastics Innovation Hub, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.

Funding

CSIRO and Murdoch University NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unprecedented plastic production has resulted in over six billion tons of harmful waste. Certain insect taxa emerge as potential agents of plastic biodegradation. Through a comprehensive manual and bibliometric literature analysis, this review analyses and consolidates the growing literature related to insect-mediated plastic breakdown. Over 23 insect species, representing Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, and 4 other orders, have been identified for their capacity to consume plastic polymers. Natural and synthetic polymers exhibit high-level similarities in molecular structure and properties. Thus, in conjunction with comparative genomics studies, we link plastic-degrading enzymatic capabilities observed in certain insects to the exaptation of endogenous enzymes originally evolved for digesting lignin, cellulose, beeswax, keratin and chitin from their native dietary substrates. Further clarification is necessary to distinguish mineralisation from physicochemical fragmentation and to differentiate microbiome-mediated degradation from direct enzymatic reactions by insects. A bibliometric analysis of the exponentially growing body of literature showed that leading research is emerging from China and the USA. Analogies between natural and synthetic polymer's degradation pathways will inform engineering robust enzymes for practical plastic bioremediation applications. By aggregating, analysing, and interpreting published insights, this review consolidates our mechanistic understanding of insects as a potential natural solution to the escalating plastic waste crisis.

Indexed as

exaptationmineralisationplastic biodegradationpolymers

Identifiers

PMID38932021
PMCPMC11207432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.