Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38932020›Full record

ReviewPolymers2024

Progress in Solvent-Based Recycling of Polymers from Multilayer Packaging.

Tianmiao Li, George Theodosopoulos, Chris Lovell, Adamantini Loukodimou, Kranthi Kumar Maniam, Shiladitya Paul

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tianmiao LiMaterials Innovation Centre, School of Engineering, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
George TheodosopoulosMaterials Performance and Integrity Technology Group, TWI Ltd., Cambridge CB21 6AL, UK.
Chris LovellMaterials Performance and Integrity Technology Group, TWI Technology and Training Centre-North East, Middlesbrough TS2 1DJ, UK.
Adamantini LoukodimouMaterials Innovation Centre, School of Engineering, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-6103-2011
Kranthi Kumar ManiamMaterials Performance and Integrity Technology Group, TWI Ltd., Cambridge CB21 6AL, UK.
Shiladitya PaulMaterials Innovation Centre, School of Engineering, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8423-313X

Funding

EU H2020 101003532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conversion of chemical feedstocks derived from fossil fuels to virgin polymer, manufacturing of plastics in coal-dependent economies, and increasing consumption of virgin polymers for plastics packaging contribute significantly to environmental issues and the challenges we face. Nowadays, promoting sustainable development has become the consensus of more and more countries. Among them, the recycling of multilayer packaging is a huge challenge. Due to the complexity of its structure and materials, as well as the limitations of existing recycling frameworks, currently, multilayer packaging cannot be commercially recycled thus resulting in a series of circular economy challenges. It is undeniable that multilayer packaging offers many positive effects on products and consumers, so banning the use of such packaging would be unwise and unrealistic. Developing the appropriate processes to recycle multilayer packaging is the most feasible strategy. In recent years, there have been some studies devoted to the recycling process of multilayer packaging. Many of the processes being developed involve the use of solvents. Based on the recycled products, we categorised these recycling processes as solvent-based recycling, including physical dissolution and chemical depolymerisation. In physical dissolution, there are mainly two approaches named delamination and selective dissolution-precipitation. Focusing on these processes, this paper reviews the solvents developed and used in the last 20 years for the recycling of polymers from multilayer packaging waste and gives a summary of their advantages and disadvantages in terms of cost, product quality, ease of processing, and environmental impact. Based on existing research, one could conclude that solvent-based recycling methods have the potential to be commercialised and become part of a standard recycling process for polymer-based multilayer packaging. The combined use of multiple solvent-based recycling processes could be a breakthrough in achieving unified recycling of multilayer packaging with different components.

Indexed as

flexible packagingmultilayerspolymerrecycling

Identifiers

PMID38932020
PMCPMC11207984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.