ReviewPharmaceutics2024
Nano-Delivery of Immunogenic Cell Death Inducers and Immune Checkpoint Blockade Agents: Single-Nanostructure Strategies for Enhancing Immunotherapy.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Localized nanomedicine for urologic cancers: anatomy-guided design and clinical translation.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Lactobacillus salivarius potentiates gastrointestinal cancer immunotherapy through its metabolite chenodeoxycholic acid.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Lysosome-centered nanomedicine for cancer therapy: mechanisms, materials, and modalities.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Targeted immunotherapies and nanomedicines for ovarian cancer: the way forward.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Advancements in polymer-based drug delivery systems targeting the tumor microenvironment for immunotherapy of triple-negative breast cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Overcoming Cancer Drug Resistance with Nanoparticle Strategies for Key Protein Inhibition.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy has revolutionized oncology by harnessing the patient's immune system to target and eliminate cancer cells. However, immune checkpoint blockades (ICBs) face limitations such as low response rates, particularly in immunologically 'cold' tumors. Enhancing tumor immunogenicity through immunogenic cell death (ICD) inducers and advanced drug delivery systems represents a promising solution. This review discusses the development and application of various nanocarriers, including polymeric nanoparticles, liposomes, peptide-based nanoparticles, and inorganic nanoparticles, designed to deliver ICD inducers and ICBs effectively. These nanocarriers improve therapeutic outcomes by converting cold tumors into hot tumors, thus enhancing immune responses and reducing systemic toxicity. By focusing on single-nanoparticle systems that co-deliver both ICD inducers and ICBs, this review highlights their potential in achieving higher drug concentrations at tumor sites, improving pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and facilitating clinical translation. Future research should aim to optimize these nanocarrier systems for better in vivo performance and clinical applications, ultimately advancing cancer immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.