Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38931897›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2024

Design of Chitin Cell Culture Matrices for 3D Tissue Engineering: The Importance of Chitin Types, Solvents, Cross-Linkers, and Fabrication Techniques.

Turna Basak, Julia L Shamshina

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Turna BasakFiber and Biopolymer Research Institute, Department of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79403, USA.
Julia L ShamshinaFiber and Biopolymer Research Institute, Department of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79403, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0708-764X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review focuses on factors and the fabrication techniques affecting the microarchitecture of tissue engineering scaffolds from the second most abundant biopolymer, chitin. It emphasizes the unique potentiality of this polymer in tissue engineering (TE) applications and highlights the variables important to achieve tailored scaffold properties. First, we describe aspects of scaffolds' design, and the complex interplay between chitin types, solvent systems, additives, and fabrication techniques to incorporate porosity, with regard to best practices. In the following section, we provide examples of scaffolds' use, with a focus on in vitro cell studies. Finally, an analysis of their biodegradability is presented. Our review emphasizes the potentiality of chitin and the pressing need for further research to overcome existing challenges and fully harness its capabilities in tissue engineering.

Indexed as

biopolymerschitinchitin TE scaffolds preparationscaffoldtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID38931897
PMCPMC11206837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.