Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38931860›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2024

The Different Strategies for the Radiolabeling of [

Jie Gao, Mei Li, Jingjing Yin, Mengya Liu, Hongliang Wang, Jin Du, Jianguo Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jie GaoChina Institute for Radiation Protection, National Atomic Energy Agency Nuclear Technology (Nonclinical Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals) Research and Development Center, CNNC Key Laboratory on Radiotoxicology and Radiopharmaceutical Preclinical Evaluation, Taiyuan 030006, China.
Mei LiChina Institute for Radiation Protection, National Atomic Energy Agency Nuclear Technology (Nonclinical Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals) Research and Development Center, CNNC Key Laboratory on Radiotoxicology and Radiopharmaceutical Preclinical Evaluation, Taiyuan 030006, China.
Jingjing YinChina Institute for Radiation Protection, National Atomic Energy Agency Nuclear Technology (Nonclinical Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals) Research and Development Center, CNNC Key Laboratory on Radiotoxicology and Radiopharmaceutical Preclinical Evaluation, Taiyuan 030006, China.
Mengya LiuChina Institute for Radiation Protection, National Atomic Energy Agency Nuclear Technology (Nonclinical Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals) Research and Development Center, CNNC Key Laboratory on Radiotoxicology and Radiopharmaceutical Preclinical Evaluation, Taiyuan 030006, China.
Hongliang WangFirst Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China.
Jin DuChina Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing 102413, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6555-7916
Jianguo LiChina Institute for Radiation Protection, National Atomic Energy Agency Nuclear Technology (Nonclinical Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals) Research and Development Center, CNNC Key Laboratory on Radiotoxicology and Radiopharmaceutical Preclinical Evaluation, Taiyuan 030006, China.

Funding

Natural Science Foundational of Shanxi Province 202303021212385Nuclear Energy Development Program of China HNKF2023 25(36)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Astatine-211 (

Indexed as

astatineradiolabelingradiopharmaceuticalstargeted alpha therapy

Identifiers

PMID38931860
PMCPMC11206656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.