Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38931788›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Developing a Five-Minute Normative Database of Heart Rate Variability for Diagnosing Cardiac Autonomic Dysregulation for Patients with Major Depressive Disorder.

Li-Hsin Chang, Min-Han Huang, I-Mei Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Li-Hsin ChangDepartment of Psychology, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807378, Taiwan.
Min-Han HuangDepartment of Psychology, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807378, Taiwan.
I-Mei LinDepartment of Psychology, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807378, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9658-1783

Funding

National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan 111-2410-H-037-021-MY2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart rate variability (HRV) is related to cardiac vagal control and emotional regulation and an index for cardiac vagal control and cardiac autonomic activity. This study aimed to develop the Taiwan HRV normative database covering individuals aged 20 to 70 years and to assess its diagnosing validity in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). A total of 311 healthy participants were in the HRV normative database and divided into five groups in 10-year age groups, and then the means and standard deviations of the HRV indices were calculated. We recruited 272 patients with MDD for cross-validation, compared their HRV indices with the normative database, and then converted them to Z-scores to explore the deviation of HRV in MDD patients from healthy groups. The results found a gradual decline in HRV indices with advancing age in the HC group, and females in the HC group exhibit higher cardiac vagal control and parasympathetic activity than males. Conversely, patients in the MDD group demonstrate lower HRV indices than those in the HC group, with their symptoms of depression and anxiety showing a negative correlation with HRV indices. The Taiwan HRV normative database has good psychometric characteristics of cross-validation.

Indexed as

Autonomic Nervous SystemHeart RateMajor Depressive DisorderAdultAgedDatabases, FactualElectrocardiographyFemaleHeartHumansMaleMiddle AgedTaiwanYoung Adultdepressionheart rate variability (HRV)Taiwan HRV normative databaseZ-scores

Identifiers

PMID38931788
PMCPMC11207773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.