Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38931773›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Design and Implementation of an Ontology for Measurement Terminology in Digital Calibration Certificates.

Shuaizhe Wang, Mingxin Du, Zilong Liu, Yuqi Luo, Xingchuang Xiong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shuaizhe WangNational Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China.ORCID 0009-0009-0696-7988
Mingxin DuThe College of Information Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Zilong LiuNational Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3637-1586
Yuqi LuoThe College of Information Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Xingchuang XiongNational Institute of Metrology, Beijing 100029, China.

Funding

China National Key R&D Program 2021YFF0600100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital Calibration Certificates (DCCs) are a key focus in metrology digitalization, necessitating that they satisfy the criteria for machine readability and understandability. Current DCCs are machine-readable, but they are still missing the essential semantic information required for machine understandability. This shortfall is particularly notable in the lack of a dedicated semantic ontology for measurement terminologies. This paper proposes a domain ontology for measurement terminologies named the OMT (Ontology for Measurement Terminology), using a foundation of metrological terms from standards like the International Vocabulary of Metrology (VIM), the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM), and JJF1001. It also incorporates insights from models such as the SI Reference Point, the Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS), and the DCC Schema. The methodology was guided by Stanford's Seven-Step Method, ensuring a systematic development process tailored to the needs of metrological semantics. Through semantic expression capability verification and SPARQL query validations, the OMT has been confirmed to possess essential machine readability and understandability features. It has been successfully integrated into version 3.2.1 of DCCs across ten representative domains. This integration demonstrates an effective method for ensuring that DCCs are machine-readable and capable of interoperating within digital environments, thereby advancing the research in metrology digitization.

Indexed as

digital calibration certificatemetrology digitalizationontologySI reference pointterminology for measurement

Identifiers

PMID38931773
PMCPMC11207306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.