Uncharged Monolithic Carbon Fibers Are More Sensitive to Cross-Junction Compression than Charged.

Oleksandr Syzoniuk, Saoni Banerji, Alvo Aabloo, Indrek Must

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oleksandr SyzoniukIMS Lab, Institute of Technology, University of Tartu, Nooruse 1, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.

Saoni BanerjiIMS Lab, Institute of Technology, University of Tartu, Nooruse 1, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0001-8221-9820

Alvo AablooIMS Lab, Institute of Technology, University of Tartu, Nooruse 1, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-0183-1282

Indrek MustIMS Lab, Institute of Technology, University of Tartu, Nooruse 1, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.

Funding

Estonian Research Council PRG1498, PRG1084

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Textile-based wearable robotics increasingly integrates sensing and energy materials to enhance functionality, particularly in physiological monitoring, demanding higher-performing and abundant robotic textiles. Among the alternatives, activated carbon cloth stands out due to its monolithic nature and high specific surface area, enabling uninterrupted electron transfer and energy storage capability in the electrical double layer, respectively. Yet, the potential of monolithic activated carbon cloth electrodes (MACCEs) in wearables still needs to be explored, particularly in sensing and energy storage. MACCE conductance increased by 29% when saturated with Na

Indexed as

activated carbon cloth electrodescharge sensorselectrical double layerpressure sensorssmart wearablestouch contacts

Identifiers

PMID38931721

DOI10.3390/s24123937

PMCPMC11207992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.