ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
A Review of Deep Learning-Based LiDAR and Camera Extrinsic Calibration.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Vision-Guided Point Cloud Refinement Method for Helical Surface Measurement: A Case Study on Screw Thread Pitch.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- GPIS-Based Calibration for Non-Overlapping Dual-LiDAR Systems Using a 2.5D Calibration Framework.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Traffic monitoring research based on roadside LiDAR-camera target-free wide-area collaborative calibration.PloS one · 2026Article
- Camera, LiDAR, and IMU Spatiotemporal Calibration: Methodological Review and Research Perspectives.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) Method for LiDAR and Camera Sensor Fusion and Pattern Matching Algorithm.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extrinsic parameter calibration is the foundation and prerequisite for LiDAR and camera data fusion of the autonomous system. This technology is widely used in fields such as autonomous driving, mobile robots, intelligent surveillance, and visual measurement. The learning-based method is one of the targetless calibrating methods in LiDAR and camera calibration. Due to its advantages of fast speed, high accuracy, and robustness under complex conditions, it has gradually been applied in practice from a simple theoretical model in just a few years, becoming an indispensable and important method. This paper systematically summarizes the research and development of this type of method in recent years. According to the principle of calibration parameter estimation, learning-based calibration algorithms are divided into two categories: accurate calibrating estimation and relative calibrating prediction. The evolution routes and algorithm frameworks of these two types of algorithms are elaborated, and the methods used in the algorithms' steps are summarized. The algorithm mechanism, advantages, limitations, and applicable scenarios are discussed. Finally, we make a summary, pointing out existing research issues and trends for future development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.