Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38931615›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

VA-LOAM: Visual Assist LiDAR Odometry and Mapping for Accurate Autonomous Navigation.

Tae-Ki Jung, Gyu-In Jee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tae-Ki JungDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0006-7200-6454
Gyu-In JeeDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we enhanced odometry performance by integrating vision sensors with LiDAR sensors, which exhibit contrasting characteristics. Vision sensors provide extensive environmental information but are limited in precise distance measurement, whereas LiDAR offers high accuracy in distance metrics but lacks detailed environmental data. By utilizing data from vision sensors, this research compensates for the inadequate descriptors of LiDAR sensors, thereby improving LiDAR feature matching performance. Traditional fusion methods, which rely on extracting depth from image features, depend heavily on vision sensors and are vulnerable under challenging conditions such as rain, darkness, or light reflection. Utilizing vision sensors as primary sensors under such conditions can lead to significant mapping errors and, in the worst cases, system divergence. Conversely, our approach uses LiDAR as the primary sensor, mitigating the shortcomings of previous methods and enabling vision sensors to support LiDAR-based mapping. This maintains LiDAR Odometry performance even in environments where vision sensors are compromised, thus enhancing performance with the support of vision sensors. We adopted five prominent algorithms from the latest LiDAR SLAM open-source projects and conducted experiments on the KITTI odometry dataset. This research proposes a novel approach by integrating a vision support module into the top three LiDAR SLAM methods, thereby improving performance. By making the source code of VA-LOAM publicly available, this work enhances the accessibility of the technology, fostering reproducibility and transparency within the research community.

Indexed as

sensor fusionSimultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM)

Identifiers

PMID38931615
PMCPMC11207686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.