Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38931603›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Comparison Analysis of Roundness Measurement of Small Cylindrical Workpieces with Different Styluses.

Borong Wu, Chuang Zeng, Qiaolin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Borong WuChongqing University-University of Cincinnati Joint Co-op Institute, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.ORCID 0009-0007-2890-7295
Chuang ZengShenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Qiaolin LiShenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the high-accuracy roundness metrology of a needle roller 1.5 mm in diameter and 5.8 mm in length using the stitching linear scan method, a ruby ball stylus with a tip radius of 150 μm and a diamond stylus with a tip radius of 2 μm were employed to perform experiments under the same conditions. The precision coordinate data, derived from the needle roller's cross-sectional circumference, were segmented into uniform eighths, each scanned with the stylus of a roughness measuring machine. The roundness profile of the needle roller was obtained by stitching the arc profiles, which were characterized according to the precision coordinate data of the arcs. The cross-correlation function, Euclidean distance, residual sum of squares, position error, and curvature of the measured arcs were used to evaluate the results, which can reflect the performance of the stylus. A comparison of the results obtained using the ruby ball stylus versus the diamond stylus demonstrates the ruby ball stylus' greater suitability for use in the roundness metrology of the needle roller bearing examined in this paper.

Indexed as

diamond stylusroundness measurementruby ball stylussmall cylindrical workpiecesstitching linear scan method

Identifiers

PMID38931603
PMCPMC11207827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.