Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38931581›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Biocompatible Electrical and Optical Interfaces for Implantable Sensors and Devices.

Yuxin Wan, Caiyi Wang, Bingao Zhang, Yixuan Liu, Hailong Yang, Fengyu Liu, Jingjing Xu, Shengyong Xu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuxin WanKey Laboratory for the Physics and Chemistry of Nanodevices, School of Electronics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Caiyi WangSchool of Integrated Circuits, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China.
Bingao ZhangKey Laboratory for the Physics and Chemistry of Nanodevices, School of Electronics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Yixuan LiuKey Laboratory for Neuroscience, Neuroscience Research Institute, Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Ministry of Education and National Health Commission, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Hailong YangKey Laboratory for Neuroscience, Neuroscience Research Institute, Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Ministry of Education and National Health Commission, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Fengyu LiuKey Laboratory for Neuroscience, Neuroscience Research Institute, Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Ministry of Education and National Health Commission, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
Jingjing XuSchool of Integrated Circuits, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0443-547X
Shengyong XuKey Laboratory for the Physics and Chemistry of Nanodevices, School of Electronics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9567-5980

Funding

the Beijing Natural Science Foundation 7242086the National Key R&D Program of China 2017YFA0701302the National Natural Science Foundation of China 32171002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implantable bioelectronics hold tremendous potential in the field of healthcare, yet the performance of these systems heavily relies on the interfaces between artificial machines and living tissues. In this paper, we discuss the recent developments of tethered interfaces, as well as those of non-tethered interfaces. Among them, systems that study neural activity receive significant attention due to their innovative developments and high relevance in contemporary research, but other functional types of interface systems are also explored to provide a comprehensive overview of the field. We also analyze the key considerations, including perforation site selection, fixing strategies, long-term retention, and wireless communication, highlighting the challenges and opportunities with stable, effective, and biocompatible interfaces. Furthermore, we propose a primitive model of biocompatible electrical and optical interfaces for implantable systems, which simultaneously possesses biocompatibility, stability, and convenience. Finally, we point out the future directions of interfacing strategies.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsBiosensing TechniquesProstheses and ImplantsAnimalsHumansWireless TechnologyBiocompatible Materialsbiocompatibilityelectrical interfacehuman–machine integrationimplanted sensoroptical interface

Identifiers

PMID38931581
PMCPMC11207811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.