Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38931500›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Automated Sensor Node Malicious Activity Detection with Explainability Analysis.

Md Zubair, Helge Janicke, Ahmad Mohsin, Leandros Maglaras, Iqbal H Sarker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Md ZubairDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology, Chittagong 4349, Bangladesh.
Helge JanickeCentre for Securing Digital Futures, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA 6027, Australia.
Ahmad MohsinCentre for Securing Digital Futures, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA 6027, Australia.
Leandros MaglarasSchool of Computing, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh EH14 1DJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5360-9782
Iqbal H SarkerCentre for Securing Digital Futures, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA 6027, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1740-5517

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cybersecurity has become a major concern in the modern world due to our heavy reliance on cyber systems. Advanced automated systems utilize many sensors for intelligent decision-making, and any malicious activity of these sensors could potentially lead to a system-wide collapse. To ensure safety and security, it is essential to have a reliable system that can automatically detect and prevent any malicious activity, and modern detection systems are created based on machine learning (ML) models. Most often, the dataset generated from the sensor node for detecting malicious activity is highly imbalanced because the Malicious class is significantly fewer than the Non-Malicious class. To address these issues, we proposed a hybrid data balancing technique in combination with a Cluster-based Under Sampling and Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE). We have also proposed an ensemble machine learning model that outperforms other standard ML models, achieving 99.7% accuracy. Additionally, we have identified the critical features that pose security risks to the sensor nodes with extensive explainability analysis of our proposed machine learning model. In brief, we have explored a hybrid data balancing method, developed a robust ensemble machine learning model for detecting malicious sensor nodes, and conducted a thorough analysis of the model's explainability.

Indexed as

cybersecuritydata balancingensemble learningexplainability analysismalicious node detectionwireless sensor node

Identifiers

PMID38931500
PMCPMC11207377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.