Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38931448›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Tailored Treatment Strategies in First Line Therapy for Ovarian Cancer Patients: A Critical Review of the Literature.

Daniela Luvero, Roberto Angioli, Federica Celoro, Francesco Plotti, Corrado Terranova, Federica Guzzo, Gianna Barbara Cundari, Federico Liparulo, Camilla Verdone, Roberto Montera

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniela LuveroDepartment of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3537-7014
Roberto AngioliDepartment of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Federica CeloroResearch Unit of Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Francesco PlottiDepartment of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Corrado TerranovaDepartment of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Federica GuzzoDepartment of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Gianna Barbara CundariResearch Unit of Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Federico LiparuloResearch Unit of Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Camilla VerdoneResearch Unit of Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Roma, Italy.
Roberto MonteraDepartment of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Roma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOvarian cancer (OC) is a significant cause of cancer-related mortality in women globally, with a five-year survival rate of approximately 49%. Standard therapy involves cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy. Its poor prognosis has driven interest in alternative therapies such as targeted molecular agents like bevacizumab and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis review systematically searched PubMed from January 2018 to December 2023 for studies on PARPi in OC. Emphasis was on identifying relevant Phase III trials, extracting data on study design, patient demographics, and outcomes. Special focus was on assessing PARPi efficacy, safety, impact on quality of life, and ongoing trials, including those on Clinicaltrials.gov.

resultsThe efficacy of PARPi in first-line therapy for OC has been extensively studied. Trials like SOLO-1, PRIMA, and ATHENA-MONO have demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), particularly in patients with BRCA mutations. Additionally, the combination of PARPi with other agents like bevacizumab has shown promising results in extending PFS. However, PARPi treatment is associated with various adverse effects, including hematologic toxicities like anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. While most adverse events are manageable, some patients may require dose adjustments or discontinuation of treatment. Importantly, PARPi maintenance therapy has not adversely affected health-related quality of life (HRQoL), with studies reporting similar HRQoL scores between PARPi-treated and placebo-treated patients.

conclusionsPARPi offer effective treatment with manageable side effects, suitable even for medically fragile patients. Individualized dosing can optimize benefits while minimizing adverse events. Exploring diverse treatment approaches, particularly in patients with limited life expectancy or high disease burden, could improve outcomes. Ongoing research is investigating alternative therapies and combinations to broaden treatment options. Combining bevacizumab with PARPi may be justified for first-line and recurrent maintenance therapy. Regardless of mutational status, PARPi should be considered for maintenance therapy in newly diagnosed advanced OC. Platinum sensitivity remains crucial for treatment decisions and predicting survival outcomes.

Indexed as

bevacizumabmaintenance therapyovarian cancerPARP inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID38931448
PMCPMC11206378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.