Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38931208›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2024

Experiences and Acceptability of a Weight Loss Intervention for Diabetes (Diabetes Remission Clinical Trial-DiRECT) in Aotearoa New Zealand: A Qualitative Study within a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial.

Kate Campbell, Meredith Peddie, Natalie Ashton, Kim Ma'ia'i, Takiwai Russell-Camp, Jim Mann, Justine Camp, Andrew N Reynolds

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Recent progress of remission in type 2 diabetes.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kate CampbellDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
Meredith PeddieDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, Aotearoa, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9357-6882
Natalie AshtonTe Kāika Health, Caversham 9012, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
Kim Ma'ia'iTe Kāika Health, Caversham 9012, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
Takiwai Russell-CampDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
Jim MannDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
Justine CampDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
Andrew N ReynoldsDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, Aotearoa, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8952-3892

Funding

Healthier Lives National Science Challenge 11601116Ministry of Social Development, Aotearoa New Zealand N/APūtahi Manawa Healthy Hearts Aotearoa Centre of Research Excellence 3724480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Diabetes Remission Clinical Trial (DiRECT) demonstrated that substantial weight loss and remission from type 2 diabetes can be achieved with low-energy total diet replacement and behavioural support. However, the acceptability of the DiRECT intervention in diverse populations with strong cultural emphases on food and shared eating remains unclear. We conducted a qualitative study nested within a pilot randomised controlled trial of DiRECT in one Māori (the Indigenous people of New Zealand) primary care provider in Aotearoa New Zealand. Participants with type 2 diabetes or prediabetes, obesity, and a desire to lose weight were randomised to either dietitian-supported usual care or the dietitian-supported DiRECT intervention for twelve months. The DiRECT intervention included three months of total diet replacement, then food reintroduction and supported weight loss maintenance. At three and twelve months, semi-structured interviews explored the acceptability of DiRECT and participants' experiences of each intervention. Interview transcripts from 25 participants (aged 48 ± 10 years, 76% female, 78% Māori or Pacific) at three months and 15 participants at twelve months were analysed. Participants viewed their pre-enrolment selves as unhealthy people with poor eating habits and desired professional weight loss support. For DiRECT participants, the total diet replacement phase was challenging but well-received, due to rapid improvements in weight and health. Food reintroduction and weight loss maintenance each presented unique challenges requiring effective strategies and adaptability. All participants considered individualised and empathetic dietetic support crucial to success. Sociocultural factors influencing success were experienced in both interventions: family and social networks provided support and motivation; however, eating-related norms were identified as challenges. The DiRECT intervention was considered an acceptable approach to weight loss in participants with type 2 diabetes or prediabetes with strong cultural emphases on food and shared eating. Our findings highlight the importance of individualised and culturally relevant behavioural support for effective weight loss and weight loss maintenance.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Qualitative ResearchWeight LossWeight Reduction ProgramsAdultDiet, ReducingFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMaori PeopleMiddle AgedNew ZealandObesityPacific Island PeoplePatient Acceptance of Health Carequalitative analysistotal diet replacementtype 2 diabetesweight loss

Identifiers

PMID38931208
PMCPMC11206426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.