Superluminal Molecular and Nanomaterial Probes Based on Fast Ions or Electrons.

Alexander Morrison, Vashista Muralidhara Srivatsa, Khashayar Ghandi

Abstract readReview

In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexander MorrisonDepartment of Chemistry, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.

Vashista Muralidhara SrivatsaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.

Khashayar GhandiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1287-0081

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work reviews the progression of chemical analysis via Cherenkov emissions, i.e., Cherenkov Photometry and Cherenkov Emission Spectroscopy, from its introduction in the literature up to modern developments. In presenting the history of this field, we aim to consolidate the literature, both for reference and contextualization. We present an argument aiming to untangle why this corner of research has seen little progress while so many other directly related aspects of Cherenkov research have flourished, as well as speak to the progress of the field in recent years and prospective direction in years to come.

Indexed as

Cherenkov countingCherenkov emissionsCherenkov photometryCherenkov spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID38930968

DOI10.3390/molecules29122903

PMCPMC11206977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.