AgIn

Xiang Li, Yuhang Zhang, Yiling Wang, Li Zhu, Yuhang Liu, Lingxing Wang

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiang LiSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chongqing 401331, China.

Yuhang ZhangSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chongqing 401331, China.

Yiling WangSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chongqing 401331, China.

Li ZhuSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chongqing 401331, China.

Yuhang LiuSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chongqing 401331, China.

Lingxing WangSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chongqing 401331, China.

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 52000019The provincial and Ministerial Co-constructive of Collaborative Innovation Center for MSW Comprehensive Utilization shljzyh2021-21The Science and technology innovation projects for college students YKJCX2120607, 202211551023

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effective treatment and recovery of fracturing wastewater has always been one of the difficult problems to be solved in oilfield wastewater treatment. Accordingly, in this paper, photocatalytic-coupled low-temperature plasma technology was used to degrade the simulated wastewater containing hydroxypropyl guar, the main component of fracturing fluid. Results indicated that hydroxypropyl-guar wastewater could be degraded to a certain extent by either photocatalytic technology or plasma technology; the chemical oxygen demand and viscosity of the treated wastewater under two single-technique optimal conditions were 781 mg·L

Indexed as

dielectric-barrier discharge–low-temperature plasma (DBD–LTP)graphitic carbon nitrideoilfield wastewaterphotocatalyst

Identifiers

PMID38930926

DOI10.3390/molecules29122862

PMCPMC11206768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.