Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38930753›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2024

Influence of Anode Immersion Speed on Current and Power in Plasma Electrolytic Polishing.

Joško Valentinčič, Henning Zeidler, Toni Böttger, Marko Jerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joško ValentinčičFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 6, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-4911-1196
Henning ZeidlerChair Additive Manufacturing, Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, Agricolastrasse 1, 09599 Freiberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0800-9678
Toni BöttgerChair Additive Manufacturing, Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, Agricolastrasse 1, 09599 Freiberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1244-7777
Marko JermanFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 6, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-6406-5979

Funding

This research was funded by European Research Executive Agency under the Horizon Europe: Widening participation and spreading excellence (SEAMAC, 101079481) and the Slovenian Research Agency (ARIS) (I2S, P2-0248) 101079481
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plasma electrolytic polishing (PeP) is mainly used to improve the surface quality and thus the performance of electrically conductive parts. It is usually used as an anodic process, i.e., the workpiece is positively charged. However, the process is susceptible to high current peaks during the formation of the vapour-gaseous envelope, especially when polishing workpieces with a large surface area. In this study, the influence of the anode immersion speed on the current peaks and the average power during the initialisation of the PeP process is investigated for an anode the size of a microreactor mould insert. Through systematic experimentation and analysis, this work provides insights into the control of the initialisation process by modulating the anode immersion speed. The results clarify the relationship between immersion speed, peak current, and average power and provide a novel approach to improve process efficiency in PeP. The highest peak current and average power occur when the electrolyte splashes over the top of the anode and not, as expected, when the anode touches the electrolyte. By immersion of the anode while the voltage is applied to the anode and counterelectrode, the reduction of both parameters is over 80%.

Indexed as

average powerimmersion speedpeak currentplasma electrolytic polishing (PeP)process initialisationvapour–gaseous envelope

Identifiers

PMID38930753
PMCPMC11205743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.