Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38930701›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2024

Study on Structural Design and Motion Characteristics of Magnetic Helical Soft Microrobots with Drug-Carrying Function.

Qian Gao, Tingting Lin, Ziteng Liu, Zebiao Chen, Zidong Chen, Cheng Hu, Teng Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qian GaoLuohe Institute of Technology, Henan University of Technology, No. 123, University Road, Yuanhui District, Luohe 462000, China.
Tingting LinHigher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou University, No. 230, West Waihuan Street, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Ziteng LiuHigher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou University, No. 230, West Waihuan Street, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Zebiao ChenHigher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou University, No. 230, West Waihuan Street, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Zidong ChenHigher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou University, No. 230, West Waihuan Street, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Cheng HuHigher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou University, No. 230, West Waihuan Street, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Teng ShenHigher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou University, No. 230, West Waihuan Street, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0423-8836

Funding

Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation No. 2020A1515111176Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation No. 2023A1515011791National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 52005116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic soft microrobots have a wide range of applications in targeted drug therapy, cell manipulation, and other aspects. Currently, the research on magnetic soft microrobots is still in the exploratory stage, and most of the research focuses on a single helical structure, which has limited space to perform drug-carrying tasks efficiently and cannot satisfy specific medical goals in terms of propulsion speed. Therefore, balancing the motion speed and drug-carrying performance is a current challenge to overcome. In this paper, a magnetically controlled cone-helix soft microrobot structure with a drug-carrying function is proposed, its helical propulsion mechanism is deduced, a dynamical model is constructed, and the microrobot structure is prepared using femtosecond laser two-photon polymerization three-dimensional printing technology for magnetic drive control experiments. The results show that under the premise of ensuring sufficient drug-carrying space, the microrobot structure proposed in this paper can realize helical propulsion quickly and stably, and the speed of motion increases with increases in the frequency of the rotating magnetic field. The microrobot with a larger cavity diameter and a larger helical pitch exhibits faster rotary advancement speed, while the microrobot with a smaller helical height and a smaller helical cone angle outperforms other structures with the same feature sizes. The microrobot with a cone angle of 0.2 rad, a helical pitch of 100 µm, a helical height of 220 µm, and a cavity diameter of 80 µm achieves a maximum longitudinal motion speed of 390 µm/s.

Indexed as

helical propulsionmagnetic actuationmagnetic soft microrobotsmotion characteristicsstructure preparation

Identifiers

PMID38930701
PMCPMC11205992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.