Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38930668›Full record

ReviewMicromachines2024

Constrained Volume Micro- and Nanoparticle Collection Methods in Microfluidic Systems.

Tanner N Wells, Holger Schmidt, Aaron R Hawkins

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tanner N WellsDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5456-1258
Holger SchmidtSchool of Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
Aaron R HawkinsDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3882-0771

Funding

Nanoparticle Tracking Analyzer (NTA) for the Center for Live Cell GenomicsRM1HG011543 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI HAUSSLER, DAVID H, SALAMA, SOFIE REDA · 2021 to 2025
$12.0M
Nanopore-based multi-target analysis of Zika virus infectionR01EB028608 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI SCHMIDT, HOLGER · 2019 to 2022
$2.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS RM1 HG011543NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB028608NIH HHS 5R01EB028608-04A1NIH HHS 5RM1HG011543-03A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Particle trapping and enrichment into confined volumes can be useful in particle processing and analysis. This review is an evaluation of the methods used to trap and enrich particles into constrained volumes in microfluidic and nanofluidic systems. These methods include physical, optical, electrical, magnetic, acoustic, and some hybrid techniques, all capable of locally enhancing nano- and microparticle concentrations on a microscale. Some key qualitative and quantitative comparison points are also explored, illustrating the specific applicability and challenges of each method. A few applications of these types of particle trapping are also discussed, including enhancing biological and chemical sensors, particle washing techniques, and fluid medium exchange systems.

Indexed as

cell trappingmicrofluidicsparticle enrichmentparticle manipulationparticle trapping

Identifiers

PMID38930668
PMCPMC11206162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.