Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38930159›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Rheology, Strength, and Durability of Concrete and Mortar Made of Recycled Calcium Silicate Masonry.

Tanel Tuisk, Simo Ilomets, Tiina Hain, Joosep Kalbus, Targo Kalamees

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tanel TuiskDepartment of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate Tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia.
Simo IlometsDepartment of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate Tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-3055-4798
Tiina HainDepartment of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate Tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia.
Joosep KalbusDepartment of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate Tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia.
Targo KalameesDepartment of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate Tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective demolition of building components and recycling construction demolition waste is a growing tendency as we move towards a circular construction. This study investigates the feasibility of using demolition waste from calcium silicate brick masonry as an aggregate in concrete and mortar. The purpose is to assess its impact on concrete and mortar properties, including compressive strength, durability, and workability. Silicate bricks from two demolished buildings were processed into aggregate, and laboratory experiments were conducted to evaluate concrete and mortar made with varying proportions of recycled aggregate. Results indicate that replacing natural aggregate (limestone rubble and sand) with recycled silicate brick aggregate up to 50% does not significantly compromise concrete performance, with no significant decrease in compressive strength observed. Frost resistance of the concrete made with recycled aggregate even surpasses that of reference concrete, possibly due to the lower density and higher (closed) porosity of the recycled aggregate. However, challenges such as increased water demand and loss of workability over time are noted with higher proportions of recycled aggregate. Further research is recommended to explore strategies for mitigating these challenges and to assess the effects of chemical admixtures on concrete properties. Overall, the findings suggest that recycled calcium silicate brick holds promise as a sustainable alternative for aggregate in concrete production.

Indexed as

calcium silicate brickconcrete aggregatefrost resistancemortar aggregaterecycled building materials

Identifiers

PMID38930159
PMCPMC11205116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.