ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Rheology, Strength, and Durability of Concrete and Mortar Made of Recycled Calcium Silicate Masonry.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Experimental and Numerical Analysis of the Quasi-Static and Dynamic Behavior of Silicate Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Selective demolition of building components and recycling construction demolition waste is a growing tendency as we move towards a circular construction. This study investigates the feasibility of using demolition waste from calcium silicate brick masonry as an aggregate in concrete and mortar. The purpose is to assess its impact on concrete and mortar properties, including compressive strength, durability, and workability. Silicate bricks from two demolished buildings were processed into aggregate, and laboratory experiments were conducted to evaluate concrete and mortar made with varying proportions of recycled aggregate. Results indicate that replacing natural aggregate (limestone rubble and sand) with recycled silicate brick aggregate up to 50% does not significantly compromise concrete performance, with no significant decrease in compressive strength observed. Frost resistance of the concrete made with recycled aggregate even surpasses that of reference concrete, possibly due to the lower density and higher (closed) porosity of the recycled aggregate. However, challenges such as increased water demand and loss of workability over time are noted with higher proportions of recycled aggregate. Further research is recommended to explore strategies for mitigating these challenges and to assess the effects of chemical admixtures on concrete properties. Overall, the findings suggest that recycled calcium silicate brick holds promise as a sustainable alternative for aggregate in concrete production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.