Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38930141›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Novel Treatment Strategies for Hormone Receptor (HR)-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Antonella Ferro, Michela Campora, Alessia Caldara, Delia De Lisi, Martina Lorenzi, Sara Monteverdi, Raluca Mihai, Alessandra Bisio, Mariachiara Dipasquale, Orazio Caffo and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Antonella FerroMedical Oncology and Breast Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, APSS Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4109-6769
Michela CamporaDepartment of Pathology, Santa Chiara Hospital, APSS Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy.
Alessia CaldaraMedical Oncology and Breast Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, APSS Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy.
Delia De LisiMedical Oncology and Breast Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, APSS Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy.
Martina LorenziMedical Oncology and Breast Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, APSS Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy.
Sara MonteverdiMedical Oncology and Breast Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, APSS Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy.
Raluca MihaiDepartment of Pathology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow G51 4TF, UK.
Alessandra BisioDepartment of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology (CIBIO), University of Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3326-1923
Mariachiara DipasqualeMedical Oncology and Breast Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, APSS Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy.
Orazio CaffoMedical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, APSS Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7968-2531
Yari CiribilliDepartment of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology (CIBIO), University of Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9231-379X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (BC) is the most common BC subtype. Endocrine therapy (ET) targeting ER signaling still remains the mainstay treatment option for hormone receptor (HR)-positive BC either in the early or in advanced setting, including different strategies, such as the suppression of estrogen production or directly blocking the ER pathway through SERMs-selective estrogen receptor modulators-or SERDs-selective estrogen receptor degraders. Nevertheless, the development of de novo or acquired endocrine resistance still remains challenging for oncologists. The use of novel ET combined with targeted drugs, such as cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, has significantly improved long-term outcome rates, thus changing the therapeutic algorithm for metastatic BC (MBC) and recently the therapeutic strategy in the adjuvant setting for early high-risk BC. Eluding the resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with ET is currently an unmet medical need, and there is disagreement concerning the best course of action for patients who continue to progress after this combination approach. Genetic changes in the tumor along its growth uncovered by genomic profiling of recurrent and/or metastatic lesions through tumor and/or liquid biopsies may predict the response or resistance to specific agents, suggesting the best therapeutic strategy for each patient by targeting the altered ER-dependent pathway (novel oral SERDs and a new generation of anti-estrogen agents) or alternative ER-independent signaling pathways such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR or tyrosine kinase receptors (

Indexed as

CDK4/6 inhibitorsendocrine therapyhormone-positive HER2-negative breast cancernext-generation endocrine agentsresistance mechanisms to ET and/or CDK4/6itargeted therapies

Identifiers

PMID38930141
PMCPMC11204965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.