ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
New Insights into Cervicofacial Vascular Anomalies.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Small Intestinal Cavernous Hemangioma Presenting with Recurrent Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Case Report and Narrative Review.International medical case reports journal · 2026Review
- Endovascular treatment of congenital arteriovenous fistulas in the parotid region using coils and absolute ethanol.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Dental management of intraoral vascular malformation in a 3.5-year-old child: case report and brief review.BMC oral health · 2025Review
- Neonatal Kaposiform Hemangioendothelioma with Kasabach-Merritt Phenomenon Presenting as Severe Airway Obstruction at Birth: A Case Report.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- SomaticGenes · 2025Article
- Surgical Resection of Vascular Anomalies of the Upper Extremity-An Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Endovascular treatment of diffuse mandibular arteriovenous malformation: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Advancing randomized controlled trials of vascular anomalies: an analysis of trial waste.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Article
- Whole-Genome Omics Elucidates the Role of CCM1 and Progesterone in Cerebral Cavernous Malformations within CmPn Networks.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital cervicofacial vascular anomalies are extremely rare and present many difficulties in diagnosis and treatment requiring a multidisciplinary approach. Firstly, there is little consensus on this subject among head and neck specialists. There are two main types of vascular anomalies: vascular tumors and vascular malformations. Vascular malformations are also divided into malformations with slow blood flow (veins, lymphatics, capillaries or combined) and malformations with a fast blood flow (arteriovenous malformations and fistula). Vascular tumors like hemangiomas are known for their spontaneous involution with aging, while vascular malformations grow in dimensions with age. It is very important to choose the correct differential diagnosis between cervicofacial hemangiomas and vascular malformations for proper therapy management. Anamnesis and clinical exams help in raising suspicions about the real nature of a cervico-vascular anomaly. Furthermore, imaging brings in-depth details of the anomaly, ranging from ultrasound and contrast CT to MRI scanning and minimally invasive angiography. Angiography with selective embolization is rarely a curative procedure for arteriovenous malformations, being more suitable as a preliminary step before attempted surgical removal. Surgery is clearly necessary when there are aesthetic and functional deficits. Slow-flow vascular malformations present a reduced morbidity, and in cases without involution, the surgical ablation is reserved for the cases with aesthetic dysfunctions or psychological trauma. Lymphatic malformations must undergo surgical ablation when they are associated with mass effects and compression of great vessels or aerial viscera. The prognosis after surgical removal is good, with a low rate of recurrence or morbidity. Fast-flow vascular malformations require a combined approach, with embolization and excision in the next 48 h for safety reasons. Removal may be followed by reconstructive surgery depending on the location and dimensions of the malformation, with a possible secondary recovery of the normal microscopic vessels. Some of the masses may hinder the normal airflow and swallowing. Pathology is the gold standard for confirming the clinical and imaging diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.