ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Alternative Access for TAVR: Choosing the Right Pathway.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanical complications of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a review article.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Simultaneous Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in a Patient With Peripheral Artery Disease Requiring Surgical Vascular Access: A Case Report.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Axillary conduit creation and passive femoral to carotid cerebral perfusion shunt creation for challenging transcatheter aortic valve placement.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026Article
- Transsubclavian versus transfemoral TAVR with self-expanding valves.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Aortoiliac calcification hindering cardiac interventions: A case for intravascular lithotripsy.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- A retrospective analysis of hemodynamic stability in TAVR and TTVR under general anesthesia: implications for sedation in TTVR.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
- Complex Transfemoral Access During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Narrative Review of Management, Complexity Scores, and Alternative Access.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Peripheral intravascular lithotripsy in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2025Article
- Access Options for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Contemporary Multi-modality Imaging of Prosthetic Aortic Valves.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as an alternative treatment option for patients with severe aortic stenosis regardless of surgical risk, particularly in those with a high and prohibitive risk. Since the advent of TAVR, transfemoral access has been the standard of care. However, given comorbidities and anatomical limitations, a proportion of patients are not good candidates for a transfemoral approach. Alternative access, including transapical, transaortic, transaxillary, transsubclavian, transcarotid, and transcaval, can be considered. Each alternative access has advantages and disadvantages, so the vascular route should be tailored to the patient's characteristics. However, there is no standardized algorithm when choosing the optimal alternative vascular access. In this review, we analyzed the evolution and current evidence for the most common alternative access for TAVR and proposed an algorithm for choosing the optimal vascular access in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.