Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38929846›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2024

To Assess or Not to Assess: Reconsidering Day 3 Embryo Quality in Planned Freeze-All Blastocyst Cycles.

Alessandro Bartolacci, Daria Marzanati, Beatrice Maria Barbagallo, Lisett Solano Narduche, Giulia D'Alessandro, Stefania Esposito, Valeria Stella Vanni, Rossella Masciangelo, Davide Gentilini, Enrico Papaleo and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alessandro BartolacciObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Daria MarzanatiDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0009-0003-4004-2176
Beatrice Maria BarbagalloObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Lisett Solano NarducheReproductive Sciences Laboratory, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-3181-2971
Giulia D'AlessandroObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Stefania EspositoObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Valeria Stella VanniObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6539-7294
Rossella MasciangeloObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Davide GentiliniDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Enrico PapaleoObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Luca PagliardiniObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3960-7454

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Day 3 embryo quality is a predictor of in vitro fertilization (IVF) success rates in cleavage-stage embryo transfer. However, the association between day 3 embryo quality and clinical outcomes in blastocyst transfer policy is largely unknown. This retrospective study included 1074 frozen-thawed single day 5/6 blastocyst transfers between January 2019 and December 2022. Three groups were assessed depending on whether the transferred blastocyst derived from a top-quality, good-quality, or poor-quality embryo at day 3. The analysis was conducted independently for each blastocyst quality group (top, good, and poor) using multivariable logistic regression. We applied a Factorial Analysis of Mixed Data (FAMD) to reduce the potential collinearity between the covariates used in the model. All the blastocysts included in this study were obtained from the first ICSI freeze-all cycles. The cleavage and blastocysts stages were assessed between 67 ± 0.5 (day 3), 115 ± 0.5 (day 5), and 139 ± 0.5 (day 6) hours post-insemination (hpi), respectively. After adjusting for the day of transfer (day 5 or day 6) and FAMD dimensions, no statistical differences in a β-HCG, clinical pregnancy, and live birth were observed among the same-quality blastocysts derived from different day 3 embryo quality groups (top = A, good = B, and poor = C). Our findings showed that a day 3 embryo quality assessment may be unnecessary in planned freeze-all blastocyst cycles.

Indexed as

blastocystembryo assessmentfreeze-all cycleslive birth

Identifiers

PMID38929846
PMCPMC11204659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.