Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38929833›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2024

Oncologic and Obstetric Outcomes Following Radical Abdominal Trachelectomy in Non-Low-Risk Early-Stage Cervical Cancers: A 10-Year Austrian Single-Center Experience.

Melina Danisch, Marlene Kranawetter, Thomas Bartl, Magdalena Postl, Christoph Grimm, Eva Langthaler, Stephan Polterauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Melina DanischDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0009-0003-0289-3738
Marlene KranawetterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Thomas BartlDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1938-1574
Magdalena PostlDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Christoph GrimmDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2948-8129
Eva LangthalerDepartment of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Stephan PolterauerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9649-4505

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radical trachelectomy allows for fertility preservation in patients with early cervical cancer not qualifying as "low-risk" as defined by ConCerv. This study reports on the 10-year surgical, oncological, and obstetrical experience of patients treated by radical abdominal trachelectomy at an Austrian tertiary care center. A retrospective chart analysis and telephone survey of all patients with FIGO stage IA2-IB2 (2018) cervical cancer treated by radical abdominal trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy between 2013 and 2022 were performed. Radical abdominal trachelectomy was attempted in 29 patients, of whom 3 patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Three cases, including one after neoadjuvant therapy, required conversion to radical hysterectomy due to positive margins; four cases had positive lymph nodes following surgical staging and were referred to primary chemo-radiotherapy. Twenty-two (75.9%) successful abdominal radical trachelectomies preserving fertility were performed. According to final histopathology, 79.3% of tumors would not have met the "low-risk"-criteria. At a median follow-up of 64.5 (25.5-104.0) months, no recurrence was observed. Eight (36.4%) patients attempted to conceive, with a live birth rate of 62.5%. Radical abdominal trachelectomy appears oncologically safe in early-stage cervical cancers that do not fulfill the "low-risk"-criteria. Strict preoperative selection of patients who might qualify for more conservative surgical approaches is strongly recommended.

Indexed as

cervical cancerfertility outcomesfertility preservationoncological outcomesradical abdominal trachelectomy

Identifiers

PMID38929833
PMCPMC11204697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.