ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Screening for Breast Cancer: A Comparative Review of Guidelines.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Defining Multiple Fibroadenomas: A Systematic Review of Clinical Characteristics and Management.The breast journal · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
- Liquid crystal thermography for breast cancer detection: principles, current evidence, limitations, and future directions.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Review
- BAMT-Net: a boundary-aware multi-task framework for 3D breast ultrasound lesion segmentation and classification.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- WISDOM randomized trial comparing risk-based versus annual breast cancer screening: study cohort characteristics and design.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Factors influencing uptake of risk-reducing mastectomy among unaffected Israeli BRCA1/BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers.Familial cancer · 2026Article
- WISDOM Randomized Trial Comparing Risk-Based Versus Annual Breast Cancer Screening: Study Cohort Characteristics and Design.Research square · 2025Article
- Four-dimensional data independent acquisition proteomics and metabolomics reveal mechanisms of hydrogen-rich water at Zusanli (ST36) point against triple-negative breast cancer in mice.Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan · 2025Article
- Mammography Completion by Age Among Women in the Veterans Health Administration.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
- Barriers to breast cancer screening among female teachers: a qualitative study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- The Rise and Refinement of Breast Thread Lifting: A Contemporary Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Emerging nanoparticle-based x-ray imaging contrast agents for breast cancer screening.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- Innovative Methodologies for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer: A Review Categorized by Target Biological Samples.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Evolution of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Application for Mammography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of Predictors and Outcomes in Breast Cancer Screening in Romania: Insights from Demographic, Clinical, and Lifestyle Factors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Advances in Risk Management and Screening for Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer: The Role of MR Imaging and Personalised Approaches.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025Review
- Addressing Global Gaps in Mammography Screening for Improved Breast Cancer Detection: A Review of the Literature.Cureus · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy diagnosed in the female population worldwide and the leading cause of death among perimenopausal women. Screening is essential, since earlier detection in combination with improvements in breast cancer treatment can reduce the associated mortality. The aim of this study was to review and compare the recommendations from published guidelines on breast cancer screening. A total of 14 guidelines on breast cancer screening issued between 2014 and 2022 were identified. A descriptive review of relevant guidelines by the World Health Organization (WHO), the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), the American Cancer Society (ACS), the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS), the American College of Radiology (ACR), the Task Force on Preventive Health Care (CTFPHC), the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) and the Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology (JJCO) for women both at average and high-risk was carried out. There is a consensus among all the reviewed guidelines that mammography is the gold standard screening modality for average-risk women. For this risk group, most of the guidelines suggest annual or biennial mammographic screening at 40-74 years, while screening should particularly focus at 50-69 years. Most of the guidelines suggest that the age limit to stop screening should be determined based on the women's health status and life expectancy. For women at high-risk, most guidelines recommend the use of annual mammography or magnetic resonance imaging, while the starting age should be earlier than the average-risk group, depending on the risk factor. There is discrepancy among the recommendations regarding the age at onset of screening in the various high-risk categories. The development of consistent international practice protocols for the most appropriate breast cancer screening programs seems of major importance to reduce mortality rates and safely guide everyday clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.