Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38929743›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for Fast and Accurate Assessment of Transthoracic Echocardiogram Image Quality.

Wojciech Nazar, Krzysztof Nazar, Ludmiła Daniłowicz-Szymanowicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wojciech NazarFaculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8448-0800
Krzysztof NazarFaculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdansk University of Technology, Gabriela Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4722-4015
Ludmiła Daniłowicz-SzymanowiczDepartment of Cardiology and Electrotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Smoluchowskiego 17, 80-213 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2269-1880

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-quality echocardiogram images are the cornerstone of accurate and reliable measurements of the heart. Therefore, this study aimed to develop, validate and compare machine learning and deep learning algorithms for accurate and automated assessment of transthoracic echocardiogram image quality. In total, 4090 single-frame two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiogram images were used from apical 4-chamber, apical 2-chamber and parasternal long-axis views sampled from 3530 adult patients. The data were extracted from CAMUS and Unity Imaging open-source datasets. For every raw image, additional grayscale block histograms were developed. For block histogram datasets, six classic machine learning algorithms were tested. Moreover, convolutional neural networks based on the pre-trained EfficientNetB4 architecture were developed for raw image datasets. Classic machine learning algorithms predicted image quality with 0.74 to 0.92 accuracy (AUC 0.81 to 0.96), whereas convolutional neural networks achieved between 0.74 and 0.89 prediction accuracy (AUC 0.79 to 0.95). Both approaches are accurate methods of echocardiogram image quality assessment. Moreover, this study is a proof of concept of a novel method of training classic machine learning algorithms on block histograms calculated from raw images. Automated echocardiogram image quality assessment methods may provide additional relevant information to the echocardiographer in daily clinical practice and improve reliability in clinical decision making.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclassificationconvolutional neural networksechocardiographyimage qualitymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38929743
PMCPMC11204556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.