Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38929410›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Monitoring Cattle Ruminating Behavior Based on an Improved Keypoint Detection Model.

Jinxing Li, Yanhong Liu, Wenxin Zheng, Xinwen Chen, Yabin Ma, Leifeng Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Keypoint-Based Forest Musk Deer Behavioral Recognition Method.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Recognition of Foal Nursing Behavior Based on an Improved RT-DETR Model.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jinxing LiCollege of Computer and Information Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China.
Yanhong LiuCollege of Computer and Information Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China.
Wenxin ZhengInstitute of Animal Husbandry Quality Standards, Xinjiang Academy of Animal Science, Urumqi 830011, China.
Xinwen ChenInstitute of Animal Husbandry Quality Standards, Xinjiang Academy of Animal Science, Urumqi 830011, China.
Yabin MaHebei Animal Husbandry and Breeding Work Station, Shijiazhuang 050049, China.
Leifeng GuoAgricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100080, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2447-2905

Funding

Shijiazhuang Key Research and Development Special Project 24011The Key Research and Development Plan of Hebei Province 22326609DThe Key Research and Development Plan of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 2023B02013The Science and Technology Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences CAAS-ASTIP-2024-AII
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cattle rumination behavior is strongly correlated with its health. Current methods often rely on manual observation or wearable devices to monitor ruminating behavior. However, the manual monitoring of cattle rumination is labor-intensive, and wearable devices often harm animals. Therefore, this study proposes a non-contact method for monitoring cattle rumination behavior, utilizing an improved YOLOv8-pose keypoint detection algorithm combined with multi-condition threshold peak detection to automatically identify chewing counts. First, we tracked and recorded the cattle's rumination behavior to build a dataset. Next, we used the improved model to capture keypoint information on the cattle. By constructing the rumination motion curve from the keypoint information and applying multi-condition threshold peak detection, we counted the chewing instances. Finally, we designed a comprehensive cattle rumination detection framework to track various rumination indicators, including chewing counts, rumination duration, and chewing frequency. In keypoint detection, our modified YOLOv8-pose achieved a 96% mAP, an improvement of 2.8%, with precision and recall increasing by 4.5% and 4.2%, enabling the more accurate capture of keypoint information. For rumination analysis, we tested ten video clips and compared the results with actual data. The experimental results showed an average chewing count error of 5.6% and a standard error of 2.23%, verifying the feasibility and effectiveness of using keypoint detection technology to analyze cattle rumination behavior. These physiological indicators of rumination behavior allow for the quicker detection of abnormalities in cattle's rumination activities, helping managers make informed decisions. Ultimately, the proposed method not only accurately monitors cattle rumination behavior but also provides technical support for precision management in animal husbandry, promoting the development of modern livestock farming.

Indexed as

cattleimproved YOLOv8-posepeak detectionrumination behavior

Identifiers

PMID38929410
PMCPMC11200719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.