Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38929264›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Electronic Heart (ECG) Monitoring at Birth and Newborn Resuscitation.

Sarah Mende, Syed Ahmed, Lise DeShea, Edgardo Szyld, Birju A Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah MendeDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma (OU), Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
Syed AhmedDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Lise DeSheaDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma (OU), Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
Edgardo SzyldNeonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Birju A ShahDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma (OU), Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9051-1183

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 10% of newborns require assistance at delivery, and heart rate (HR) is the primary vital sign providers use to guide resuscitation methods. In 2016, the American Heart Association (AHA) suggested electrocardiogram in the delivery room (DR-ECG) to measure heart rate during resuscitation. This study aimed to compare the frequency of resuscitation methods used before and after implementation of the AHA recommendations.

methodsThis longitudinal retrospective cohort study compared a pre-implementation (2015) cohort with two post-implementation cohorts (2017, 2021) at our Level IV neonatal intensive care unit.

resultsAn initial increase in chest compressions at birth associated with the introduction of DR-ECG monitoring was mitigated by focused educational interventions on effective ventilation. Implementation was accompanied by no changes in neonatal mortality.

conclusionsInvestigation of neonatal outcomes during the ongoing incorporation of DR-ECG may help our understanding of human and system factors, identify ways to optimize resuscitation team performance, and assess the impact of targeted training initiatives on clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

assessmentdeliveryelectrocardiogramheart rateinfantmeasurementneonateoutcomesresuscitationteam performance

Identifiers

PMID38929264
PMCPMC11202155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.