Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38928946›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Meta-Analysis of Internet Gaming Disorder Prevalence: Assessing the Impacts of DSM-5 and ICD-11 Diagnostic Criteria.

Ruoyu Zhou, Nobuaki Morita, Yasukazu Ogai, Tamaki Saito, Xinyue Zhang, Wenjie Yang, Fan Yang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Internet Gaming Disorder and Nonmedical Prescription Drug Use: The Moderating Role of Student Status.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ruoyu ZhouDoctoral Program in Human Care Science, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577, Japan.ORCID 0009-0003-4378-5733
Nobuaki MoritaDepartment of Social Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577, Japan.
Yasukazu OgaiDepartment of Social Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0082-0706
Tamaki SaitoDepartment of Social Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577, Japan.
Xinyue ZhangPublic Health Degree Program, Faculty of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577, Japan.
Wenjie YangThe Mental Health Center, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China.
Fan YangGraduate School of Letters, Arts and Sciences, Waseda University, Tokyo 162-8644, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7961-3111

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the inclusion of Internet gaming disorder (IGD) in both the DSM-5 and ICD-11, understanding the prevalence and diagnostic discrepancies is crucial for developing appropriate interventions. This study presents a meta-analysis of the prevalence of IGD based on two diagnostic criteria. We systematically searched the PubMed and Web of Science databases. A total of 22 studies were included in the final analysis. The analysis incorporated studies employing the DSM-5 and ICD-11 criteria and focused on the impact of various factors, including study location, sample characteristics, sample size, and quality score, on the reported prevalence rates using a random-effects model. The pooled prevalence of IGD is 6.7% (95% CI: 5.7-7.7%). The subgroup analysis indicated significant differences in the prevalence rates of IGD (DSM-5 criteria) and GD (ICD-11 criteria) (Q b = 38.46,

Indexed as

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersInternational Classification of DiseasesInternet Addiction DisorderHumansInternetPrevalenceDSM-5gaming disorderICD-11Internet gaming disordermeta-analysisprevalence

Identifiers

PMID38928946
PMCPMC11203952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.