Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38928933›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Reliability and Validity of Self-Reported Questionnaires Assessing Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Finland.

Pauliina Husu, Henri Vähä-Ypyä, Kari Tokola, Harri Sievänen, Paulo Rocha, Tommi Vasankari

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pauliina HusuThe UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Kaupinpuistonkatu 1, FI-33500 Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1502-7428
Henri Vähä-YpyäThe UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Kaupinpuistonkatu 1, FI-33500 Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-7537-2501
Kari TokolaThe UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Kaupinpuistonkatu 1, FI-33500 Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6466-4100
Harri SievänenThe UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Kaupinpuistonkatu 1, FI-33500 Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3172-248X
Paulo RochaPortuguese Institute for Sport and Youth, 1250-190 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8971-5501
Tommi VasankariThe UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Kaupinpuistonkatu 1, FI-33500 Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-7209-9351

Funding

Erasmus+ -programme of the European Union: EUPASMOS Plus - European Union Physical Ac-tivity and Sport Monitoring System Plus n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable and valid data on physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) are needed for implementing evidence-based interventions and policies. Monitoring of these behaviors is based on PA questionnaires (PAQs) and device-based measurements, but their comparability is challenging. The present study aimed to investigate the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of Finnish versions of the widely used PAQs (IPAQ-SF, EHIS-PAQ, GPAQ, Eurobarometer) and to compare their data with accelerometer data. This study is based on the Finnish data of the European Union Physical Activity and Sport Monitoring project (EUPASMOS). Participants (

Indexed as

AccelerometryExerciseSedentary BehaviorSelf ReportAdultAgedFemaleFinlandHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultaccelerometryreliabilityself-reporttest–retest studyvalidity

Identifiers

PMID38928933
PMCPMC11203568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.