Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38928803›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Flower Species Ingredient Verification Using Orthogonal Molecular Methods.

Subramanyam Ragupathy, Arunachalam Thirugnanasambandam, Thomas Henry, Varathan Vinayagam, Ragupathy Sneha, Steven G Newmaster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Subramanyam RagupathyNatural Health Product Research Alliance, College of Biological Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Arunachalam ThirugnanasambandamNatural Health Product Research Alliance, College of Biological Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7948-2257
Thomas HenryNatural Health Product Research Alliance, College of Biological Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Varathan VinayagamNatural Health Product Research Alliance, College of Biological Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0009-0005-9226-447X
Ragupathy SnehaCollege of Medicine, American University of Antigua, Jobberwock Beach Road, Coolidge P.O. Box W1451, Antigua.
Steven G NewmasterNatural Health Product Research Alliance, College of Biological Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.

Funding

University of Guelph 053312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flowers are gaining considerable interest among consumers as ingredients in food, beverages, cosmetics, and natural health products. The supply chain trades in multiple forms of botanicals, including fresh whole flowers, which are easier to identify than dried flowers or flowers processed as powdered or liquid extracts. There is a gap in the scientific methods available for the verification of flower species ingredients traded in the supply chains of multiple markets. The objective of this paper is to develop methods for flower species ingredient verification using two orthogonal methods. More specifically, the objectives of this study employed both (1) DNA-based molecular diagnostic methods and (2) NMR metabolite fingerprint methods in the identification of 23 common flower species ingredients. NMR data analysis reveals considerable information on the variation in metabolites present in different flower species, including color variants within species. This study provides a comprehensive comparison of two orthogonal methods for verifying flower species ingredient supply chains to ensure the highest quality products. By thoroughly analyzing the benefits and limitations of each approach, this research offers valuable insights to support quality assurance and improve consumer confidence.

Indexed as

flowersnatural health productsnuclear magnetic resonancequality assurance

Identifiers

PMID38928803
PMCPMC11203286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.