ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Biochemical Markers for Neuroendocrine Tumors: Traditional Circulating Markers and Recent Development-A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Somatic Profiling of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England) · 2026Article
- Review
- Clinical Value of a 51-Neuroendocrine Tumor-Specific Gene Signature (NETest 2.0) for Management of Pancreatic and Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Prospective Study in a Consecutive Cohort of 82 Patients Considered for Surgery.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026Article
- The specificity trap in routine tumor biomarker interpretation: Advancing the 3PM-based clinical decision framework to benefits of patients.The EPMA journal · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Challenge of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumour Mimicking Biliary Disease: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Predicting Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis in Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of Cervix: A Validated Nomogram Incorporating Neuroendocrine Markers and Clinical Parameters.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Risk Factors and Prognosis of Peritoneal Metastases in Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Molecular Deconvolution of Circulating "Other Cells": A Reliable Predictive Marker of Therapy Response and Survival in Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients ReceivingCancer medicine · 2026Article
- From diagnosis to treatment: navigating the course for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.Annals of medicine · 2025Review
- Dual PET Imaging with [Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Commentary on "Low-grade duodenal neuroendocrine tumor in a 72-year-old man: A case report" by Al-Jawad et al., 2025.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms presenting unique challenges in diagnosis and management. Traditional markers such as chromogranin A (CgA), pancreatic polypeptide (PP), and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) have limitations in terms of specificity and sensitivity. Specific circulating markers such as serotonin and its metabolite 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) and various gastrointestinal hormones such as gastrin, glucagon, somatostatin, and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) have a role in identifying functional NENs. Recent advances in molecular and biochemical markers, also accounting for novel genomic and proteomic markers, have significantly improved the landscape for the diagnosis and monitoring of NENs. This review discusses these developments, focusing on both traditional markers such as CgA and NSE, as well as specific hormones like gastrin, insulin, somatostatin, glucagon, and VIP. Additionally, it covers emerging genomic and proteomic markers that are shaping current research. The clinical applicability of these markers is highlighted, and their role in improving diagnostic accuracy, predicting surgical outcomes, and monitoring response to treatment is demonstrated. The review also highlights the need for further research, including validation of these markers in larger studies, development of standardized assays, and integration with imaging techniques. The evolving field of biochemical markers holds promise for improving patient outcomes in the treatment of NENs, although challenges in standardization and validation remain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.