Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38928683›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Predicting Tumor Dynamics Post-Staged GKRS: Machine Learning Models in Brain Metastases Prognosis.

Ana-Maria Trofin, Călin Gh Buzea, Răzvan Buga, Maricel Agop, Lăcrămioara Ochiuz, Dragos Teodor Iancu, Lucian Eva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of image-based deep learning for glaucomatous optic neuropathy detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana-Maria TrofinUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T. Popa" Iași, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Călin Gh BuzeaClinical Emergency Hospital "Prof. Dr. Nicolae Oblu" Iași, 700309 Iasi, Romania.
Răzvan BugaUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T. Popa" Iași, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Maricel AgopPhysics Department, Technical University "Gheorghe Asachi" Iasi, 700050 Iasi, Romania.
Lăcrămioara OchiuzUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T. Popa" Iași, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-6447-0958
Dragos Teodor IancuUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T. Popa" Iași, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Lucian EvaClinical Emergency Hospital "Prof. Dr. Nicolae Oblu" Iași, 700309 Iasi, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assesses the predictive performance of six machine learning models and a 1D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) in forecasting tumor dynamics within three months following Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) in 77 brain metastasis (BM) patients. The analysis meticulously evaluates each model before and after hyperparameter tuning, utilizing accuracy, AUC, and other metrics derived from confusion matrices. The CNN model showcased notable performance with an accuracy of 98% and an AUC of 0.97, effectively complementing the broader model analysis. Initial findings highlighted that XGBoost significantly outperformed other models with an accuracy of 0.95 and an AUC of 0.95 before tuning. Post-tuning, the Support Vector Machine (SVM) demonstrated the most substantial improvement, achieving an accuracy of 0.98 and an AUC of 0.98. Conversely, XGBoost showed a decline in performance after tuning, indicating potential overfitting. The study also explores feature importance across models, noting that features like "control at one year", "age of the patient", and "beam-on time for volume V1 treated" were consistently influential across various models, albeit their impacts were interpreted differently depending on the model's underlying mechanics. This comprehensive evaluation not only underscores the importance of model selection and hyperparameter tuning but also highlights the practical implications in medical diagnostic scenarios, where the accuracy of positive predictions can be crucial. Our research explores the effects of staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) on larger tumors, revealing no significant outcome differences across protocols. It uniquely considers the impact of beam-on time and fraction intervals on treatment efficacy. However, the investigation is limited by a small patient cohort and data from a single institution, suggesting the need for future multicenter research.

Indexed as

brain metastasisfeature importancegamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS)machine learning modelstumor dynamics forecasting

Identifiers

PMID38928683
PMCPMC11203132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.