ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Utilizing Aerobic Capacity Data for EDSS Score Estimation in Multiple Sclerosis: A Machine Learning Approach.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is the most popular method to assess disease progression and treatment effectiveness in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). One of the main problems with the EDSS method is that different results can be determined by different physicians for the same patient. In this case, it is necessary to produce autonomous solutions that will increase the reliability of the EDSS, which has a decision-making role. This study proposes a machine learning approach to predict EDSS scores using aerobic capacity data from PwMS. The primary goal is to reduce potential complications resulting from incorrect scoring procedures. Cardiovascular and aerobic capacity parameters of individuals, including aerobic capacity, ventilation, respiratory frequency, heart rate, average oxygen density, load, and energy expenditure, were evaluated. These parameters were given as input to CatBoost, gradient boosting (GBM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and decision tree (DT) machine learning methods. The most significant EDSS results were determined with the XGBoost algorithm. Mean absolute error, root mean square error, mean square error, mean absolute percent error, and R square values were obtained as 0.26, 0.4, 0.26, 16, and 0.68, respectively. The XGBoost based machine learning technique was shown to be effective in predicting EDSS based on aerobic capacity and cardiovascular data in PwMS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.